Carraro C, Botteon M (1997) Sharing burdens and stability of the coalition in environmental negotiations with asymmetric countries. In: Carraro C (eds) International Environmental Negotiations. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA Hoel M, Schneider K (1997) encourage participation in an international environmental treaty. About Resour Econ 9 (2): 153-170 Barrett S (1997b) Heterogeneous international environmental agreements. In: Carraro Carlo (eds) International Environmental Negotiations. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1998) International Agreement on the Environment: Incentives and Political Economy. Eur Econ Rev 42 (3-5): 561-572. doi:10.1016/S0014-2921 (97)00118-9 Heister J, Mohr E, Stahler F, Stoll P-T, Wolfum R (1997) Strategies for Enforcing an International CO2 Treaty. Int About Aff 9 (1): 22-53 Kolstad C (2007) Systematic uncertainty in the self-enforcement of international environmental agreements. J About Econ Manage 53 (1): 68-79.

doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2006.08.001 Botteon M, Carraro C (1998) Environmental negotiation strategies: question of the link with heterogeneous countries. In: Hanley N, Folmer H (eds) Game Theory and the Environment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA Swanson T, Johnston S (1999) Global environmental problems and international environmental agreements: the economy of strengthening international institutions. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA Barrett S (1997a) The strategy of trade sanctions in international environmental agreements. Resour Energy Econ 19 (1): 345-361. doi:10.1016/S0928-7655 (97)00016-X Folmer H, van Mouche P, Ragland S (1993) Interconnected Games and international environmental problems. About Resour Econ 3 (4): 313-335. doi:10.1007/BF004188115 Simmons BA (1998) Compliance with international agreements. Annu Rev Polit Sci 1(1): 75-93.

doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.1.1.75 Chandler P, Tulkens H (1997) The heart of an economy with multilateral environmental extremes. Int J Game Theory 26 (3): 379-401 Osmani D, Tol RSJ (2007) Towards farsightedly stable international environmental agreements: part one. Hamburg University Working Papers, FNU-140 Carraro C, Marchiori C, Oreffice S (2003) Minimum endogenous participation in international environmental contracts. Nota Di Lavaro 113.2003. Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei Working Paper Barrett S (1998a) On the theory and diplomacy of environmental treaty making. About Resour Econ 11 (1): 317-333. doi:10.1023/A:1008243528330 Macho-Stadler I, Perez-Castrillo D (2006) Best Enforcement and Emissions Policy and Respect for Environmental Taxes. J About Econ Manage 51 (1): 110-131.

doi:10.1016/j.jeem.2005.06.001 Keohane RO (1986) Reciprocity in international relations. Int Organ 40 (1): 1-27 Carraro C, Siniscalco D (1993) Strategies for International Environmental Protection. J Public Econ 52 (3): 309-328. doi:10.1016/0047-2727 (93)90037-T Wagner UJ (2001) The development of stable international environmental agreements: economic theory and political economy. J Econ Surv 15 (3): 377-411. doi:10.1111/1467-6419.00143 Finus M (2004) International cooperation to solve international pollution problems. Fondazione Eni Enrico Enrico Mattei Working Paper Oberthur S (1998) The International Convention on the Regulation of Whaling: From Overexploitation to Total Ban. Directory of international cooperation on the environment and development. Earthscan Publishers, London In the basic model of literature on international environmental agreements (IEAs) (Barrett, 1994, Rubio and Ulph, 2006), the number of signatories to self-coercing IEAs does not exceed three if non-positive emissions are excluded. We are expanding this model by introducing a consumer and fossil fuel good that is produced and consumed in each country and marketed on world markets. If the signatory countries act as Stackelberg`s leaders and emissions are positive, the size of stable IEAs in our international trade model can be significantly larger.